Difference between revisions of "Template:Criticism section"
en>Ntmamgtw |
m (1 revision imported) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 12:47, 8 August 2019
 | This article's Criticism or Controversy section may compromise the article's neutral point of view of the subject. (November 2024) |
Template documentationContents
Description
This template is meant for articles with Criticism, Controversy or similarly-titled sections that segregate a series of negative details into one section.
Note that criticism and controversy sections are not prohibited by policy, and the tag should only be used if there is a real concern that the criticism section and its contents are causing trouble with the article's neutrality.
Adding this template to a section without opening any discussion of the matter on the article's talkpage may result in the template's removal from the article.
Usage
Place {{Criticism section}} at the top of the section. You may also include a date, using the following format:
{{Criticism section|date=November 2024}}
This template sorts articles into Category:Articles needing POV-check, or a dated subcategory thereof.
See also
Redirects
- {{Criticism-section}}
- {{Controversy-section}}
- {{Criticism}}
- {{Csection}}
| The above documentation is transcluded from Template:Criticism section/doc. (edit | history) Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (create | mirror) and testcases (create) pages. Please add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template. |
